Meena Nanji & Tommy Gear.

Meena Nanji

*1963 in Nairobi, KEN, lebt und arbeitet in Los Angeles, USA

studied at California Institute of the Arts, California, USA


Tommy Gear

*1976 in Seattle, USA, lebt und arbeitet in Los Angeles, USA

 

Ausstellungen (Nanji) [Auswahl]:
2012 Oaxaca Film Fest, Oaxaca,MEX
2010 United Nations Conference on the Environment, Copenhagen, DEN
2009 Persistence Resistance, New Delhi, IND
2008 Cinema Verite, Tehran Int’l Documentary Film Festival, Tehran, IRN
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC, USA

 

Transmissions from Alphaville redux

Date: 2012
Length: 16:40 min.
Format: 4:3
Specifications: Colour, Sound, Two Channel
Courtesy the artists

 

 

Der Titel „Transmissions From Alphaville Redux“ ist eine Anlehnung an Jean-Luc Godards Film „Alphaville“ (1965) und gleichzeitig der erste Teil einer geplanten Trilogie Meena Nanjis. Sie widmet sich den in Godards Film noch als fiktionale Dystopie gezeigten Lebensumständen in einem Überwachungsstaat. Der Betrachter wird zu Beginn durch ein System aus menschenleeren Korridoren geführt. Eine Verortung ist unmöglich, die unruhige Kameraführung, die unübliche Perspektive auf Bauchhöhe und die schlechte Belichtung der Aufnahme erinnern an Spionageaufnahmen. Aber wer überwacht hier wen? Den Videoaufnahmen werden erläuternde Textfelder gegenübergestellt, die über die im Rahmen des Patriot Acts (2001) veränderte Gesetzgebung aufklären. Die sich wiederholenden Korridor-Aufnahmen schleusen den Betrachter immer tiefer in ein perfides System aus absurder und willkürlicher politischer Gesetzgebung und enden schließlich bei einer Auflistung derjenigen, die dieser Gesetzgebung zum Opfer gefallen sind. Die Gegenüberstellung von Videomaterial aus den 60er Jahren und zeitgenössischen Aufnahmen provoziert eine Reflexion über die Rechtmäßigkeit, Effektivität und Notwendigkeit eines erbarmungslosen Staatsapparates, der sein gewalttätiges Vorgehen gegen die Bevölkerung mit seinen Sicherheitsbedenken rechtfertigt.

Magali Steinbüchel

 

 

Interview:

 

► 1. Your work has been chosen among over 2000 festival entries to participate in VIDEONALE.14. In which context do you prefer to present your work, festival/cinema context or exhibition? And what kind of difference does the respective mode of presentation mean for you / your work?

 

I think my preference for the way my work is presented depends on the actual work itself. The work in the Videonale 14 is meant to be a 2 channel video, and so it makes sense to me that it should be presented in an exhibition context. The work is also supposed to loop and I make the assumption that people can walk in and out of the piece at anytime. It isn’t designed to be watched all in one go or chronologically as set out in the project’s timeline – rather it is set up in a rhizomatic way, so that people can enter the work at any time. (Though of course I would love them to watch the whole thing!) For single channel works  - that are meant to be seen from start to finish in a linear fashion - a festival/cinema context makes sense, as I would want to capture the viewer’s attention for the whole piece. Thus the darkness, relative quiet of the cinema context, etc is appropriate for this kind of work.

 

 

► 2. Art can be seen as a mirror that registers and reflects life or as a tool that transforms it. Is there a particular theme, concept or problem your art addresses the most?

 

I like to think of my art as reflective pieces that cause viewers to reflect themselves on the themes or the experience of the work. However, I also have a more ‘activist’ side, whereby the work is quite informational, about a certain issue or subject that I feel does not have enough exposure – social justice and civil liberty issues. My creative impulse is that of the poetry that the moving image can capture, yet the activist impulse is to move people to action or transformation. In some works I try to combine these elements.

 

 

► 3. In which way is the video medium an excellent possibility to express your intended subjects, especially in contrast to other media you use? Or do you work exclusively with video?

 

I do work mostly in video and I love it because it is so malleable and can be used in so many ways – as single or multichannel, as cinema or exhibition. There are also so many ways you can combine images in order to make some sort of meaning – or not – narrative  - or not - the potential is vast, and so there’s a lot of room to experiment. I haven’t done much large scale multi-channel work, but there’s something I find very exciting about this. And single channel for more in-depth immersive work is also very exciting. Other mediums for me don’t offer the same kinds of potential of combining elements such as the word, sound, music, text, etc, but they offer a different kind of experience. For me, video seems to offer the most expression.

 

 

► 4. If you have the chance to ask the visitors of the VIDEONALE.14 exhibition questions about your own work, what would be your question?

 
I guess I would like to know what they ‘got’ from the work – what do they leave with?

 

 

  • Vom 17.2.-02.4.2017 findet die 16. Ausgabe der Videonale ̶ Festival für Video und zeitbasierte Kunstformen statt, mit einer... mehr
  • Videonale Bonn und Video Art Network (VAN) Lagos schließen sich zusammen, um gemeinsam das Projekt „VIDEONALE IN... mehr
  • mit Anderwald + Grond (Wien) Videopräsentation Christine de la Garenne und Diskussion   In Kooperation mit DAS... mehr
Logo Videonale e.V.

Newsletter

Zum Abonnieren des Videonale-Newsletter bitte E-Mail eintragen.


Newsletter

Stay informed on our latest news!